Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs NIO ET7 comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 653 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 59,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or NIO ET7?
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
Ford Puma is substantially cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the NIO ET7 costs 59,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 36,000 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is considerably more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 19 kWh/100km for the NIO ET7. That’s a difference of about 6 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the NIO ET7 offers noticeably more range – reaching up to 584 km, about 167 km more than the Ford Puma.
ET7
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the NIO ET7 offers significantly more power – delivering 653 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 485 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the NIO ET7 is considerably quicker – completing the sprint in 3.8 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.4 s. That’s about 3.6 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the NIO ET7 delivers clearly more torque with 850 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 560 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is considerably lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,434 kg. The difference is around 1,118 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries only slightly more – 469 kg compared to 466 kg. That’s a difference of about 3 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The NIO ET7 is clearly ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £59,900
NIO ET7
Ford Puma
NIO ET7
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
NIO ET7
The NIO ET7 arrives like a calm thunderstorm — sleek, silent and unapologetically clever, turning motorway cruising into the sort of effortless glide that makes other cars feel noisy and rehearsed. Inside, it's all luxury sofas and smart gadgets that actually help rather than confuse, so buyers who crave tech and comfort will feel like they've upgraded their life without needing to spellcheck the manual.
details
Ford Puma
NIO ET7
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
59,900 - 68,900 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
19 - 19.3 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
451 - 584 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
73.5 - 90 kWh
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Sedan
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
4
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
2,434 - 2,454 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
363 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
5,101 mm
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
1,987 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
1,509 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
446 - 466 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
653 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
3.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
850 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
480 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,022
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
NIO
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.