Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Ford Puma vs Renault Master Transporter comparison
Compare performance (168 HP vs 170 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 38,600 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or Renault Master Transporter?
Ford Puma vs Renault Master Transporter: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
Puma
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
Ford Puma is significantly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Renault Master Transporter costs 38,600 £ . That’s a price difference of around 14,733 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is markedly more efficient than the Renault Master Transporter with 6.8 L/100km. The difference is about 1.4 L/100km.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is considerably more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 22.7 kWh/100km for the Renault Master Transporter. That’s a difference of about 9.7 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Renault Master Transporter offers marginally more range – reaching up to 448 km, about 31 km more than the Ford Puma.
Master Transporter
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Renault Master Transporter offers marginally more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 2 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is clearly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Renault Master Transporter takes 13.5 s. That’s about 6.1 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Renault Master Transporter delivers clearly more torque with 380 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 90 Nm more.
Puma
Space and Everyday Use:
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Seats: Ford Puma offers more seats – 5 vs 3.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is considerably lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 2,128 kg. The difference is around 812 kg.
When it comes to payload, the Renault Master Transporter carries significantly more – 1,846 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 1,377 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Ford Puma
Renault Master Transporter
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
Renault Master Transporter
The Renault Master is a pragmatic workhorse that swallows cargo with an unbothered grin, offering clever practicality and load-friendly packaging for tradespeople and fleet buyers. It won’t excite like a sports car, but it steers predictably, runs economically and gets the job done day after day — like a reliable colleague who never calls in sick.
details
Ford Puma
Renault Master Transporter
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
Price
38,600 - 55,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
6.8 - 12.1 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
22.7 - 25.7 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
Electric Range
177 - 448 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
co2
0 - 318 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
Cargo Van
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
3
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
Curb weight
2,128 - 2,598 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
Trunk capacity
-
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
Width
2,080 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Payload
902 - 1,846 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Diesel
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
Power HP
130 - 170 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
13.5 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
Torque
300 - 380 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
Power kW
96 - 125 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
Engine capacity
1,997 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, G
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Renault
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.