VS

Ford Puma vs SEAT Ateca comparison

Compare performance (168 HP vs 150 HP), boot space and price (23,900 £ vs 25,100 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Puma or SEAT Ateca?

Ford Puma vs SEAT Ateca: Key differences

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • barely cheaper
  • somewhat more power
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter

SEAT Ateca

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately more efficient

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Puma

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

Ford Puma is barely cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the SEAT Ateca costs 25,100 £ . That’s a price difference of around 1,191 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the SEAT Ateca uses 4.9 L/100km and is moderately more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.5 L/100km.

Ateca

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers somewhat more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is markedly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the SEAT Ateca takes 9 s. That’s about 1.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the SEAT Ateca delivers somewhat more torque with 360 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm more.

Puma

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is barely lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,345 kg. The difference is around 29 kg.

When it comes to payload, the SEAT Ateca carries somewhat more – 525 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 56 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma has the upper hand in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 404 - 417 km
details

Frequently compared as well

SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
The SEAT Ateca is the sensible, roomy sibling that prioritises practicality and comfort, while the VW T‑Roc plays the cooler, more characterful role with sharper styling and a slightly cheekier drive — both share the VW Group's solid underpinnings and similar engines. Choose the Ateca if you need …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Ford Puma
SEAT Ateca

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

SEAT Ateca

The SEAT Ateca blends sharp, purposeful styling with practical space that turns everyday errands into something a bit more enjoyable. It’s poised and engaging to drive for its segment, offers solid value, and has just enough personality to make you smile on the school run.

details
SEAT-Ateca-2020_36_HQ
SEAT-Ateca_012
SEAT-Ateca_011
SEAT-Ateca_006
SEAT-Ateca_004

Reviews SEAT Ateca

4.9 (3 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
VW T-Cross
VS
The Ford Puma and VW T‑Cross go head-to-head in the compact crossover class — one flirty and fun, the other sensible and steady — both promising SUV looks without the bulk. We’ll pit the Puma’s lively handling and clever storage tricks against the T‑Cross’s comfort-first setup and family-friendly …
Ford Puma
Lexus LBX
VS
Small crossover clash: the Ford Puma brings cheeky driving dynamics and clever practicality, while the Lexus LBX counters with quiet refinement and premium flair. Pick the Puma if you want fun and value, choose the LBX if you crave comfort and a luxury badge — either way, you’ll be trading up from …
Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Ford Puma stands out with its striking design and impressive driving dynamics, making it a popular choice for those seeking a sporty feel. Meanwhile, the SEAT Arona appeals to buyers with its spacious interior and efficient engine options, offering …
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Kona
VS
In this exciting comparison, the Ford Puma takes on the Hyundai Kona, two standout competitors in the crossover segment. The Puma impresses with its engaging driving dynamics and stylish design, while the Kona offers a more tech-savvy interior and a range of efficient powertrains. Ultimately, both …
Ford Puma
Nissan Qashqai
VS
In the competitive arena of compact SUVs, the Ford Puma and Nissan Qashqai offer distinct advantages. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and lively handling, making it an exciting choice for city driving. Meanwhile, the Nissan Qashqai provides a versatile and spacious ride, equipped …
SEAT Ateca
Skoda Kamiq
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the SEAT Ateca and Skoda Kamiq offer distinct yet appealing options for buyers. The Ateca impresses with its sporty design and responsive handling, making it a favorite among those who prioritize driving dynamics. Meanwhile, the Kamiq stands out for its …
Ford Puma
SEAT Ateca

Costs and Consumption
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Price
25,100 - 36,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 6.4 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.7 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
129 - 144 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Curb weight
1,345 - 1,514 kg
Trunk capacity
-
Trunk capacity
510 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,805 mm
Width
1,841 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
516 - 525 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
116 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 11 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1,968 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
Ford
Brand
SEAT
What drivetrain options does the Ford Puma have?

The Ford Puma is available as Front-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.