VS

Ford Puma vs SEAT Ateca – Which car suits you better?

Two cars, one duel: Ford Puma meets SEAT Ateca.
Which one wins in performance, efficiency and value for money? Find out now!

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Costs and Efficiency: When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Ford Puma has a slight advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the SEAT Ateca costs 25100 £. That’s a price difference of around 334 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: SEAT Ateca manages with 4.90 L and is therefore to a small extent more efficient than the Ford Puma with 5.40 L. The difference is about 0.50 L per 100 km.

Engine and Performance: Power, torque and acceleration are the classic benchmarks for car enthusiasts – and here, some clear differences start to show.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma has a a bit edge – offering 168 HP compared to 150 HP. That’s roughly 18 HP more horsepower.

In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is distinct quicker – completing the sprint in 7.40 s, while the SEAT Ateca takes 9 s. That’s about 1.60 s faster.

In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs slight better – reaching 210 km/h, while the SEAT Ateca tops out at 202 km/h. The difference is around 8 km/h.

There’s also a difference in torque: SEAT Ateca pulls somewhat stronger with 360 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 70 Nm difference.

Space and Everyday Use: Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In curb weight, Ford Puma is barely noticeable lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1345 kg. The difference is around 29 kg.

In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers minimal more room – 523 L compared to 510 L. That’s a difference of about 13 L.

In maximum load capacity, the SEAT Ateca performs distinct better – up to 1604 L, which is about 321 L more than the Ford Puma.

When it comes to payload, SEAT Ateca somewhat takes the win – 525 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 56 kg.

Who comes out on top?

Overall, the SEAT Ateca shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.

from about £25,100
SEAT-Ateca-2020_36_HQ

SEAT Ateca

  • Engine Type : Petrol, Diesel
  • Transmission : Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 116 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 4.9 - 6.4 L
details

Ford Puma

5 (1)
rate

The Ford Puma presents itself as a stylish compact SUV with a distinctive design that combines practicality with a dynamic driving experience. Its sleek lines and sporty aesthetics make it stand out on the road, while the interior offers a comfortable and tech-savvy environment. With an emphasis on efficiency and a smooth drive, the Ford Puma is well-suited for both urban commutes and countryside adventures.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11 @ puma.fordpresskits.com
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29 @ puma.fordpresskits.com

SEAT Ateca

5 (1)
rate

The SEAT Ateca stands out with its dynamic design, perfectly blending style and functionality for urban and rural settings alike. Inside, it offers a spacious and comfortable cabin, complete with advanced technology and intuitive controls that enhance the driving experience. On the road, the Ateca delivers a balanced performance, providing a smooth ride with agile handling that makes it versatile for various driving conditions.

details
SEAT-Ateca-2020_36_HQ @ seat-mediacenter.com
SEAT-Ateca_012 @ seat-mediacenter.com
SEAT-Ateca_011 @ seat-mediacenter.com
SEAT-Ateca_006 @ seat-mediacenter.com
SEAT-Ateca_004 @ seat-mediacenter.com

Similar Comparisons

Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday practicality, the ID.3 for smooth, emissions-free cruising and lower running costs — your wallet and the planet will thank you differently.
Ford Puma
MG MG4
VS
In the competitive world of compact SUVs, the Ford Puma stands out with its sporty handling and stylish design, appealing to those who crave a dynamic driving experience. Meanwhile, the MG4, with its affordable pricing and generous equipment list, offers a compelling alternative, particularly for those prioritizing value for money. Both models bring unique strengths, making the choice largely dependent on whether the buyer seeks spirited performance or practical features.
Ford Puma
SEAT Ateca
Puma
Ateca

Costs and Consumption
Price
24800 - 36300 £
Price
25100 - 36900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 6.4 L
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
Electric Range
-
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 - 135 g/km
co2
129 - 144 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
Fuel tank capacity
50 L

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
5
Doors
5
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
Curb weight
1345 - 1514 kg
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Trunk capacity
510 L
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
Length
4381 mm
Width
1805 mm
Width
1841 mm
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
Height
1601 mm
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
Max trunk capacity
1604 L
Payload
367 - 469 kg
Payload
516 - 525 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Power HP
116 - 150 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 11 s
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
Max Speed
183 - 202 km/h
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Torque
200 - 360 Nm
Number of Cylinders
3
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Power kW
85 - 110 kW
Engine capacity
999 cm3
Engine capacity
999 - 1968 cm3

General
Model Year
2025
Model Year
2024 - 2025
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
Brand
Ford
Brand
SEAT

Similar Comparisons

CUPRA Terramar
SEAT Ateca
VS
The CUPRA Terramar and SEAT Ateca present a compelling showdown in the compact SUV segment, each boasting unique attributes that cater to diverse driver preferences. The Terramar shines with its sporty design and higher-performance features, making it a more dynamic choice for enthusiasts. In contrast, the SEAT Ateca offers practicality and comfort, appealing to families and everyday commuters who value reliability and versatility.
Ford Puma
Vauxhall Corsa
VS
In the highly competitive compact car segment, the Ford Puma stands out with its robust styling and dynamic driving performance, offering a sporty edge perfect for city and country roads alike. In contrast, the Vauxhall Corsa impresses with its practical design and tech-forward interior, appealing to those who prioritize efficiency and comfort in a more streamlined package. Ultimately, the choice between the Puma and Corsa hinges on whether your preference leans towards spirited driving or urban practicality.
Ford Puma
Vauxhall Frontera
VS
In the latest showdown between the Ford Puma and Opel Frontera, performance enthusiasts will find the Puma's sleek design and nimble handling a stark contrast to the Frontera's rugged off-road capabilities. While the Puma excels in urban agility and fuel efficiency, the Frontera stands out for its durability and versatility in challenging terrains. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles hinges on personal lifestyle needs, with the Puma appealing more to city drivers and the Frontera capturing the spirit of adventure seekers.
Ford Focus
Ford Puma
VS
In the realm of compact vehicles, the Ford Focus and Ford Puma present two compelling choices, each with its own unique appeal. The Focus is celebrated for its spacious interior and engaging driving dynamics, making it an ideal option for families and enthusiasts alike. On the other hand, the Puma stands out with its stylish design and versatility, offering a sportier feel while maintaining practicality for everyday use.
Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma and the Renault 5 both offer unique appeals in the compact car segment. The Ford Puma stands out with its sporty design and dynamic driving experience, making it an excellent choice for those seeking a blend of style and performance. In contrast, the Renault 5 charms with its iconic retro design and efficient urban mobility, making it a beloved choice for city drivers who appreciate a touch of nostalgia with modern functionality.
CUPRA Ateca
SEAT Ateca
VS
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact crossover segment, the Ford Puma and Mazda CX-30 stand out with their distinctive designs and engaging driving dynamics. The Puma impresses with its sporty handling and practicality, making it a favorite for those seeking a fun urban ride. Meanwhile, the CX-30 captivates with its premium interior and refined performance, appealing to buyers looking for a more upscale experience in this class.
SEAT Ateca
VW T-Roc
VS
In the competitive crossover segment, the SEAT Ateca and VW T-Roc present compelling options for buyers seeking style and performance. While the Ateca offers a sportier handling demeanor and a more engaging driving experience, the T-Roc shines with its premium interior and advanced technology features. Both vehicles provide ample space and versatility, making them ideal choices for urban lifestyles, but each has its unique flair to cater to different tastes.
Is the Ford Puma offered with different drivetrains?

The Ford Puma is offered with Front-Wheel Drive.

The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.