Compare performance (233 HP vs 327 HP), boot space and price (41,900 £ vs 49,300 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Ford Transit Custom Bus or Mazda CX-80?
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Transit Custom Bus is a bit cheaper – starting at 41,900 £ , while the Mazda CX-80 costs 49,300 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,457 £.
Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Transit Custom Bus uses 3.9 L/100km and is very slightly more efficient than the Mazda CX-80 with 4 L/100km. The difference is about 0.1 L/100km.
As for electric range, the Mazda CX-80 offers slightly more range – reaching up to 60 km, about 7 km more than the Ford Transit Custom Bus.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda CX-80 offers noticeably more power – delivering 327 HP compared to 233 HP. That’s roughly 94 HP more horsepower.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Transit Custom Bus delivers slightly more torque with 630 Nm compared to 550 Nm. That’s about 80 Nm more.
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Seats: Ford Transit Custom Bus offers more seats – 9 vs 7.
Looking at boot space, the Mazda CX-80 offers clearly more boot space – 258 L compared to 0 L. That’s a difference of about 258 L.
The Mazda CX-80 is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Ford Transit Custom Bus is a workhorse with a surprisingly comfy streak, offering a roomy, practical cabin that keeps passengers happy on long runs. It steers with more finesse than you’d expect from a people-mover and, whether you’re running a shuttle or converting it for weekend adventures, it’s a dependable, no-nonsense choice that makes life easier for drivers and operators alike.
detailsThe Mazda CX-80 brings polished, near-premium styling and a cabin that feels far classier than its badge might imply. It steers with a composed, engaging character and packs the sensible practicality families want — with just enough flair to make school runs feel a little less ordinary.
detailsCosts and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
41,900 - 63,000 £
|
Price
49,300 - 61,400 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
3.9 - 8.5 L/100km
|
Consumption L/100km
4 - 5.6 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
22.3 - 26.4 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
|
Electric Range
52 - 53 km
|
Electric Range
60 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
11.8 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 - 222 g/km
|
co2
91 - 146 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
55 - 63 L
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
Bus
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
9
|
Seats
7
|
|
Doors
4
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
-
|
Curb weight
2,131 - 2,240 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
0 L
|
Trunk capacity
258 L
|
|
Length
5,050 - 5,450 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
2,032 mm
|
Width
1,890 mm
|
|
Height
1,958 - 1,959 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
-
|
Payload
649 - 650 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Diesel, Plugin Hybrid, Electric
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid, Diesel MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox, CVT, Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Automatic Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
110 - 233 HP
|
Power HP
254 - 327 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
6.8 - 8.4 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
310 - 630 Nm
|
Torque
500 - 550 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
4
|
Number of Cylinders
4 - 6
|
|
Power kW
81 - 171 kW
|
Power kW
187 - 241 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
1,996 - 2,488 cm3
|
Engine capacity
2,488 - 3,283 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,023 - 2,025
|
Model Year
2,025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
G, B, A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B, E
|
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Mazda
|