VS

KGM Korando vs Ford Puma comparison

Compare performance (163 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (19,700 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – KGM Korando or Ford Puma?

KGM Korando vs Ford Puma: Key differences

KGM Korando

  • clearly cheaper
  • marginally more trunk space
details

Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
  • very slightly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • only slightly lighter
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

Korando

Costs and Efficiency:

Looking at overall running costs, both models reveal some interesting differences in everyday economy.

KGM Korando is clearly cheaper – starting at 19,700 £ , while the Ford Puma costs 23,900 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,209 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Ford Puma uses 5.4 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the KGM Korando with 7.7 L/100km. The difference is about 2.3 L/100km.

Puma

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Ford Puma offers very slightly more power – delivering 168 HP compared to 163 HP. That’s roughly 5 HP more horsepower.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Ford Puma delivers barely more torque with 290 Nm compared to 280 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.

Space and Everyday Use:

Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is only slightly lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,442 kg. The difference is around 126 kg.

Looking at boot space, the KGM Korando offers marginally more boot space – 551 L compared to 523 L. That’s a difference of about 28 L.

When it comes to payload, the KGM Korando carries moderately more – 538 kg compared to 469 kg. That’s a difference of about 69 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Ford Puma is decisively ahead in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 404 - 417 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
SEAT Arona
VS
In one corner, the Ford Puma brings sporty flair and sharp handling to the small-SUV ring; in the other, the SEAT Arona sticks to sensible practicality and wallet-friendly charm. Which one wins your city commute, weekend escape and resale cheque comes down to whether you want fun on twisty roads or …
Ford Puma
Opel Corsa
VS
The Ford Puma is the cheeky compact crossover that pairs SUV looks and a surprisingly roomy boot with sprightly turbo punch, while the Opel Corsa is a tidy, affordable city hatch that’s nimbler in traffic and kinder on fuel bills. If you want a higher driving position, more practical load space and …
KGM Korando
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

KGM Korando

The Korando is a practical compact SUV that focuses on a roomy, comfortable cabin and straightforward, value-oriented packaging. It delivers a composed ride with user-friendly tech, making it a sensible choice for buyers who prioritize everyday usability over flash.

details
serpimg_ygqZF6

Reviews KGM Korando

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Ford Puma

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

details
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_02
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_07
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_11
FORD_2020_PUMA_ST_29

Reviews Ford Puma

3 (11 Reviews)
rate
Marco
29 Jan 2026, 11:36:48

Exceptional car — after a year of use, no problems, only pleasant surprises.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Dino
23 Dec 2025, 21:51:22

76,000 km in 4 years. Two services carried out. Nothing more.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Nigga nigga long
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:50

For nigga boys

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Commuter (short/medium distance)
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money
Adolf hitler
13 Dec 2025, 19:32:08

Piece of rubbish
Looks gay

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Company car / Business
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Frequently compared as well

Ford Puma
Renault R5
VS
The Ford Puma is a practical, punchy compact crossover — roomy, fun to drive and full of clever storage — while the Renault 5 returns as a cheeky, retro-styled city car (now electric), favouring charm and efficiency over outright versatility. If you need everyday space and a grin on country lanes, …
Ford Puma
Kia EV2
VS
The Ford Puma and Kia EV2 represent two different approaches in the compact crossover class: the Puma delivers engaging handling, practical packaging and petrol/hybrid options, while the EV2 is a clean-sheet electric aimed at low running costs, range and modern tech. Choose the Puma if driving …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Ford Puma
VW ID.3
VS
If you want a cheeky, petrol-powered crossover with nimble handling and clever storage, the Ford Puma punches above its class; if you prefer silent, techy electric motoring with a roomy, refined cabin, the VW ID.3 is the smarter, greener choice. Choose the Puma for personality and everyday …
Ford Puma
Hyundai Kona
VS
The Ford Puma and Hyundai Kona are two of the most popular compact crossovers, combining practical interiors, elevated driving positions and city-friendly footprints. Choosing between the Puma’s engaging handling and efficient mild-hybrid options and the Kona’s broader engine range and tech-rich …
Ford Puma
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Choosing between the Ford Puma and the Nissan Qashqai comes down to whether you value a punchy, city-friendly crossover with sharp handling and clever storage or a more spacious, comfort-focused compact SUV for longer journeys. The Puma excels at engaging driving dynamics and smart packaging, while …
Ford Puma
CUPRA Raval
VS
Comparing the Ford Puma and the Cupra Raval pits a practical, compact crossover known for clever packaging and everyday efficiency against a bolder, sport-oriented compact that emphasizes sharper handling, tech and aggressive styling. Your choice comes down to whether you prioritise comfort, …
Ford Puma
Lexus LBX
VS
Small crossover clash: the Ford Puma brings cheeky driving dynamics and clever practicality, while the Lexus LBX counters with quiet refinement and premium flair. Pick the Puma if you want fun and value, choose the LBX if you crave comfort and a luxury badge — either way, you’ll be trading up from …
KGM Korando
Ford Puma

Costs and Consumption
Price
19,700 - 34,200 £
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
Consumption L/100km
7.7 - 8.7 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
180 - 205 g/km
co2
0 - 135 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,442 - 1,537 kg
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
Trunk capacity
551 L
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,870 mm
Width
1,805 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
536 - 538 kg
Payload
367 - 469 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
Power HP
163 HP
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
-
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
260 - 280 Nm
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
3
Power kW
120 kW
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
Engine capacity
1,497 cm3
Engine capacity
999 cm3

General
Model Year
2026
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
CO2 Efficiency Class
G
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
Brand
KGM
Brand
Ford
What drivetrain options does the KGM Korando have?

The KGM Korando is available as Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.