VS

Mazda CX-30 vs Audi Q3 comparison

Compare performance (186 HP vs 272 HP), boot space and price (25,200 £ vs 38,200 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda CX-30 or Audi Q3?

Mazda CX-30 vs Audi Q3: Key differences

Mazda CX-30

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
  • considerably cheaper
  • somewhat lighter

Audi Q3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • significantly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit more trunk space

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

CX-30

Costs and Efficiency:

Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.

Mazda CX-30 is considerably cheaper – starting at 25,200 £ , while the Audi Q3 costs 38,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 12,994 £.

Fuel consumption also shows a difference: the Audi Q3 uses 1.7 L/100km and is clearly more efficient than the Mazda CX-30 with 5.7 L/100km. The difference is about 4 L/100km.

Q3

Engine and Performance:

Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.

When it comes to engine power, the Audi Q3 offers clearly more power – delivering 272 HP compared to 186 HP. That’s roughly 86 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Audi Q3 is significantly quicker – completing the sprint in 5.7 s, while the Mazda CX-30 takes 8.3 s. That’s about 2.6 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q3 delivers noticeably more torque with 400 Nm compared to 240 Nm. That’s about 160 Nm more.

CX-30

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Mazda CX-30 is somewhat lighter – 1,455 kg compared to 1,635 kg. The difference is around 180 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q3 offers a bit more boot space – 488 L compared to 430 L. That’s a difference of about 58 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q3 carries very slightly more – 535 kg compared to 496 kg. That’s a difference of about 39 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Audi Q3 stands well ahead of its rival in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £38,200
Q3

Audi Q3

  • Engine Type : Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 150 - 272 HP
  • Consumption L/100km : 1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
  • Electric Range : 118 - 119 km
details

Frequently compared as well

Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for …
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; …
Mazda CX-30
Audi Q3

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 blends sleek coupe-like lines with the practicality of a compact crossover, feeling more premium than its price tag suggests. It’s a joy to drive for anyone who likes a taut chassis and an interior that treats daily commutes like a small luxury escape.

details
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_44
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_42
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_act_27
2022_mazda_cx-30_src_spain_int_3

Reviews Mazda CX-30

4.6 (3 Reviews)
rate
Stefan Zapp
31 Jan 2026, 22:32:56

I drive a CX30 with 150 hp. I'm very satisfied with the car.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Leisure / Weekend driver
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Audi Q3

The Audi Q3 feels like a grown-up compact SUV with premium polish and city-friendly agility, the sort of car that makes weekend escapes and daily commutes equally satisfying. Inside, you get quality materials and smart packaging that keep things practical without skimping on style, so it’s an easy pick for buyers who want luxury without the drama.

details
A188605_overfull
A188610_overfull
A188613_overfull
A1814467_overfull
A188626_overfull

Reviews Audi Q3

5 (1 Reviews)
rate
dd
2 Nov 2025, 22:05:04

Very comfortable. Precise steering. E35 petrol engine, 150 hp — sufficient. Manual gearbox very good and well-geared. Looks very handsome. Very large boot. Premium interior.

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q3
VW T-Roc
VS
The Audi Q3 plays the compact‑premium role perfectly — a hushed, well‑built cabin, polished manners and a level of refinement that makes the higher price feel like an investment in peace of mind. The VW T‑Roc, meanwhile, is the cheekier, better‑value sibling: bolder styling, sprightlier handling …
Mazda CX-30
Skoda Kamiq
VS
The Mazda CX-30 is the stylish, driver's compact SUV that blends near-premium looks and crisp handling, while the Škoda Kamiq plays the sensible card with clever packaging, a roomier boot and lower running costs. Pick the CX-30 if you want a more emotional, fun-to-drive compact with a nicer …
Mazda CX-30
Toyota Yaris Cross
VS
The Mazda CX-30 feels like a little premium driver’s car with sharper handling, a beautifully put-together interior and just the sort of polish that makes daily drives more enjoyable, while the Toyota Yaris Cross leans hard into practicality and hybrid efficiency for city life. Pick the CX-30 if …
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick …
Audi Q3
Audi Q4 e-tron
VS
In the competitive landscape of compact luxury SUVs, the Audi Q3 and Audi Q4 e-tron present distinct offerings tailored to different preferences. The Q3 impresses with its spirited performance and traditional gasoline engine, while the Q4 e-tron showcases Audi's commitment to electrification with a …
Audi Q3
Skoda Karoq
VS
In the competitive compact SUV segment, the Audi Q3 and Skoda Karoq stand out with their distinct character and appeal. While the Q3 offers a luxurious interior and advanced tech features that cater to premium buyers, the Karoq impresses with its practicality and value for money, making it a …
Audi Q3
CUPRA Terramar
VS
The Audi Q3 dresses up compact-SUV practicality in premium polish — plush interior, refined ride and tech that whispers “grown-up” refinement. The CUPRA Terramar, by contrast, prowls with sharper handling, punchier engines and a sporty attitude that’ll make you smile even if the mpg takes a hit, so …
Honda HR-V
Mazda CX-30
VS
In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Honda HR-V and Mazda CX-30 stand out for their unique appeal and driving dynamics. While the HR-V offers a spacious interior and versatile cargo options, the CX-30 impresses with its upscale cabin and engaging handling. Ultimately, your choice between …
Mazda CX-30
Audi Q3

Costs and Consumption
Price
25,200 - 36,800 £
Price
38,200 - 52,900 £
Consumption L/100km
5.7 - 6.6 L/100km
Consumption L/100km
1.7 - 8.6 L/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
-
Electric Range
-
Electric Range
118 - 119 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
129 - 148 g/km
co2
39 - 195 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
1,455 - 1,587 kg
Curb weight
1,635 - 1,900 kg
Trunk capacity
422 - 430 L
Trunk capacity
375 - 488 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,795 mm
Width
1,859 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
458 - 496 kg
Payload
505 - 535 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Petrol, Plugin Hybrid, Diesel
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Automatic Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Dual-Clutch Automatic
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
140 - 186 HP
Power HP
150 - 272 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
8.3 - 10.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 9.2 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
238 - 240 Nm
Torque
250 - 400 Nm
Number of Cylinders
4
Number of Cylinders
4
Power kW
103 - 137 kW
Power kW
110 - 200 kW
Engine capacity
1,998 - 2,488 cm3
Engine capacity
1,498 - 1,984 cm3

General
Model Year
2,025
Model Year
2,025
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, G, B
Brand
Mazda
Brand
Audi
What drive types are available for the Mazda CX-30?

Available configurations include Front-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.