Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
Česko
EspañaVS
Mazda MX-30 vs Ford Puma comparison
Compare performance (170 HP vs 168 HP), boot space and price (30,800 £ vs 23,900 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Mazda MX-30 or Ford Puma?
Mazda MX-30 vs Ford Puma: Key differences
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
MX-30
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma is markedly cheaper – starting at 23,900 £ , while the Mazda MX-30 costs 30,800 £ . That’s a price difference of around 6,934 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Ford Puma is substantially more efficient: consuming 13 kWh/100km compared to 18.3 kWh/100km for the Mazda MX-30. That’s a difference of about 5.3 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Ford Puma offers significantly more range – reaching up to 417 km, about 332 km more than the Mazda MX-30.
Puma
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the Mazda MX-30 offers marginally more power – delivering 170 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 2 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Ford Puma is visibly quicker – completing the sprint in 7.4 s, while the Mazda MX-30 takes 9.1 s. That’s about 1.7 s quicker.
MX-30
Space and Everyday Use:
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Ford Puma is considerably lighter – 1,316 kg compared to 1,849 kg. The difference is around 533 kg.
Looking at boot space, the Ford Puma offers clearly more boot space – 523 L compared to 350 L. That’s a difference of about 173 L.
When it comes to payload, the Ford Puma carries moderately more – 469 kg compared to 402 kg. That’s a difference of about 67 kg.
Who wins the race in the data check?
The Ford Puma is far ahead overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
from £23,900
Ford Puma
Mazda MX-30
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis
View detailed analysis
Mazda MX-30
The Mazda MX-30 trades conventional EV practicality for a boutique vibe, wrapping easy urban agility and a stylish, artisan interior into a compact package that stands out in the crossover crowd. It’s ideal for city-minded buyers who value design and driving feel over long-distance trips, and its quirky details prove Mazda can be playful without losing its driver-focused soul.
details
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.
details
Mazda MX-30
Ford Puma
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
30,800 - 37,100 £
|
Price
23,900 - 36,300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
18.3 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
85 km
|
Electric Range
404 - 417 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
22 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
1,849 kg
|
Curb weight
1,316 - 1,563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
332 - 350 L
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
4,395 mm
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,848 mm
|
Width
1,805 mm
|
|
Height
1,555 mm
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1,137 - 1,155 L
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
402 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Plugin Hybrid
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
170 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9.1 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
140 km/h
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
-
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
125 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
830 cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2025
|
Model Year
2,025 - 2,026
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
B
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, A
|
|
Brand
Mazda
|
Brand
Ford
|
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved.
The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.