In the competitive compact SUV segment, the SEAT Ateca and Škoda Karoq continue to impress with their blend of practicality and performance. While both models share the same platform and underpinning technology, the Ateca’s sporty design appeals to those seeking a more dynamic aesthetic, while the Karoq offers a more understated, versatile approach. Ultimately, the choice between these two vehicles comes down to personal preference, but both deliver exceptional driving experiences and ample space for families.
In the ever-evolving landscape of compact SUVs, the SEAT Ateca and Skoda Karoq stand out as two formidable contenders. With both brands under the Volkswagen Group umbrella, these models share a wealth of technological advancements while maintaining their unique identities. In this comparison, we will delve into the technical specifications, performance, and notable innovations, shedding light on which SUV is the better choice for discerning buyers.
Both the SEAT Ateca and Skoda Karoq showcase striking designs that appeal to modern consumers. The Ateca measures 4381 mm in length, 1841 mm in width, and 1601 mm in height. Meanwhile, the Karoq is slightly longer, with dimensions of 4390 mm in length and varying heights of up to 1624 mm, enhancing its road presence.
The trunk capacity of the Ateca is rated at 510 liters, while the Karoq edges out with a slightly larger capacity of 521 liters, offering more space for luggage and essentials. This marginal difference could be a determining factor for potential buyers focused on practicality.
Under the hood, both the Ateca and Karoq offer a range of petrol and diesel engines. The Ateca comes with two primary engine options, namely the 1.0 TSI producing 116 HP and a more powerful 1.5 TSI delivering 150 HP. In contrast, the Karoq has a broader selection, including engines that generate 115 HP, 150 HP, and even a 190 HP variant, giving drivers more options depending on their performance needs.
Both models come equipped with front-wheel-drive configurations, but the Karoq also provides an all-wheel-drive option, catering to those who require better traction during adverse weather conditions or off-road scenarios.
In terms of fuel efficiency, the SEAT Ateca offers competitive consumption figures ranging from 4.9 to 6.4 liters per 100 km, depending on the engine choice. The Skoda Karoq slightly outperforms its rival, with consumption figures ranging from 4.9 to 7.6 liters per 100 km. Both vehicles maintain respectable CO2 emissions ratings; the Ateca registers between 129 to 144 g/km, while the Karoq's emissions range between 129 to 174 g/km.
Acceleration is a key performance metric, and here the Ateca shows impressive figures, reaching 0-100 km/h in as quick as 9 seconds for the more powerful 1.5 TSI engine. The Karoq, with its range of engines, can achieve similar acceleration times, particularly with its 150 HP variant clocking in at 8.9 seconds, and the 190 HP variant achieving an astonishing 7 seconds.
Both vehicles promise engaging handling, with their well-tuned suspension systems designed for comfort and agility, making them perfect for both urban environments and highway cruising.
As expected from contemporary SUVs, both the Ateca and Karoq boast a suite of advanced technological features. The Ateca is equipped with a standard infotainment system that includes a touch screen, smartphone integration, and driver assistance technologies. Notably, it offers innovative safety features such as Traffic Jam Assist and Lane Keep Assist, enhancing driver confidence on the road.
The Karoq, similarly, is rich in tech features, offering a user-friendly infotainment interface with options for virtual cockpit displays and enhanced driver-assistance technologies. Furthermore, Skoda’s vRS Sport mode allows for tailored responses to various driving conditions, offering an exhilarating driving experience.
Ultimately, the choice between the SEAT Ateca and Skoda Karoq boils down to personal preferences and specific needs. The Ateca leans more towards sporty performance, appealing to those seeking dynamic driving experiences. In contrast, the Karoq presents a slightly larger cargo space and additional engine options, making it a practical choice for families and adventurers alike.
Both SUVs represent excellent value in the compact segment, boasting modern designs, impressive technology, and reliable performance. Buyers are encouraged to test drive both models to ascertain which suits their lifestyle and driving habits best.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 25100 - 37900
£
|
Price
about 28400 - 41000
£
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 6.4
L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
129 - 144
g/km
|
co2
129 - 174
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
50
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1345 - 1514
kg
|
Curb weight
1364 - 1608
kg
|
Trunk capacity
510
L
|
Trunk capacity
521
L
|
Length
4381
mm
|
Length
4384 - 4390
mm
|
Width
1841
mm
|
Width
1841
mm
|
Height
1601
mm
|
Height
1603 - 1624
mm
|
Payload
516 - 525
kg
|
Payload
426 - 573
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Schaltgetriebe, Automat. Schaltgetriebe (Doppelkupplung)
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
116 - 150
HP
|
Power HP
115 - 190
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
9 - 11
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 10.6
s
|
Max Speed
183 - 202
km/h
|
Max Speed
193 - 221
km/h
|
Torque
200 - 360
Nm
|
Torque
200 - 360
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
85 - 110
kW
|
Power kW
85 - 140
kW
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1968
cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1984
cm3
|
Top speed
183 - 202
km/h
|
Top speed
193 - 221
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2024 - 2025
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
E, D
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
|
Brand
SEAT
|
Brand
Skoda
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.