VS

Volvo EX40 vs Audi Q4 e-tron comparison

Compare performance (442 HP vs 340 HP), boot space and price (45,200 £ vs 40,700 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo EX40 or Audi Q4 e-tron?

Volvo EX40 vs Audi Q4 e-tron: Key differences

Volvo EX40

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • clearly more power
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
details

Audi Q4 e-tron

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate
  • moderately cheaper
  • a bit more efficient
  • very slightly more electric range
  • very slightly lighter
  • noticeably more trunk space
details

All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.

By Achim Sedelmaier

EX40

Audi Q4 e-tron VS Volvo EX40: the compact premium EV face-off

The Audi Q4 e-tron and Volvo EX40 aim at the same sweet spot: a calm, comfortable compact electric SUV that makes daily life easier. Audi Q4 e-tron VS Volvo EX40 boils down to character and priorities rather than headline stats. The Audi leans into quiet confidence and seamless usability, while the Volvo adds a dose of punch and clever practicality. Both feel premium, but they deliver that vibe in very different ways that matter on the school run, in tight car parks, and over long motorway slogs.

Q4 e-tron

Driving feel: serene Audi, punchy Volvo

The Audi Q4 e-tron prefers smooth, measured progress; it’s secure and tidy rather than playful, encouraging relaxed driving. The Volvo EX40 feels noticeably keener when you ask for full thrust, especially in higher-output versions, and it gets up to speed with less effort. Steering tells the story: the Q4 e-tron is steady and predictable, the EX40 lighter and a touch more aloof, reinforcing each car’s calm-first brief. If you want effortless overtakes and a sense of instant shove, the Volvo EX40 has the edge; if you value a composed, unflustered groove, the Audi Q4 e-tron suits that better.

EX40

Comfort and long-distance manners

Both settle into a quiet cruise, but the Audi Q4 e-tron stands out for its hushed cabin and planted motorway stride. The Volvo EX40 counterpunches with superb front seats that keep you fresh over hours, plus a soothing ride on sensible wheel sizes. Efficiency tips in Audi’s favor on faster journeys, making it the easier car for stretching between stops, while the Volvo’s excellent Google-based route planning helps take the stress out of charging decisions. In short, the Q4 e-tron feels built for relaxed, low-drama distance, whereas the EX40 wins you over with seat comfort and stress-free guidance.

Q4 e-tron

Cabin feel and tech usability

The Audi Q4 e-tron’s interior is clean and familiar, with proper climate buttons that you can hit by feel, though some touch-sensitive steering controls can irritate. Materials look smart, yet certain hard plastics keep it from feeling truly plush in places. The Volvo EX40 goes for a warm, minimalist vibe and Google Built-in that nails navigation and voice control, but occasional software hiccups and buried regen settings can frustrate. Day to day, the Audi’s straightforward controls feel easier on the move, while the Volvo’s integrated apps and natural voice commands shine when you lean on the tech.

EX40

Space and practicality

The Audi Q4 e-tron makes family life simple with generous rear legroom and a flat floor that’s friendly for child seats and teens alike. Its boot is usefully shaped and bigger in practice, though there’s no extra front compartment for cables. The Volvo EX40’s cargo bay is smaller on paper but cleverly split with a variable floor, and the bonus frunk keeps charging gear clean and accessible. Rear head and knee room are fine for the class, but if you regularly pack bulky luggage or a pushchair plus shopping, the Audi’s main load area is the easier fit.

Q4 e-tron

City manners, costs and buyer fit

In town, the Q4 e-tron (especially in rear-drive form) turns more tightly than you expect for its size, while the EX40’s compact footprint, light steering and one-pedal mode make stop‑and‑go pleasantly simple. The Audi generally starts at a lower price and tends to be a bit thriftier in real use, but options climb quickly; the Volvo often feels better equipped out of the box yet commands a higher ticket. Visibility trade-offs are different too: the Audi’s thick front pillars can hinder at junctions, whereas the Volvo’s rear view is more compromised. If you’re a motorway commuter or a family prioritizing space and serenity, the Audi Q4 e-tron fits cleanly; if you’re urban‑based, value swift response and baked‑in Google smarts plus a handy frunk, the Volvo EX40 will feel tailor-made as you head into the technical comparison.

Frequently compared as well

Volvo EX40
Volvo EX60
VS
Volvo’s EX40 and EX60 lock horns in a neatly staged duel: the nimble EX40 is a city-savvy, efficiency-first EV built for tight streets and savvy budgets, while the larger EX60 brings more space, stronger performance and longer range for family life and weekend escapes. Pick this showdown for a …
Volvo EX40
Skoda Elroq
VS
The Volvo EX40 and Skoda Elroq offer contemporary takes on the small SUV segment, but they aim at different buyers — Volvo leans toward premium refinement while Skoda focuses on pragmatic value and space. This comparison will look at driving character, interior practicality, technology and running …

Here’s where it gets real: The technical differences in detail

EX40

Costs and Efficiency:

When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.

Audi Q4 e-tron is moderately cheaper – starting at 40,700 £ , while the Volvo EX40 costs 45,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 4,534 £.

In terms of energy consumption, the Audi Q4 e-tron is a bit more efficient: consuming 14.8 kWh/100km compared to 16.6 kWh/100km for the Volvo EX40. That’s a difference of about 1.8 kWh/100km.

As for electric range, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 592 km, about 16 km more than the Volvo EX40.

Q4 e-tron

Engine and Performance:

Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.

When it comes to engine power, the Volvo EX40 offers clearly more power – delivering 442 HP compared to 340 HP. That’s roughly 102 HP more horsepower.

When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the Volvo EX40 is a bit quicker – completing the sprint in 4.6 s, while the Audi Q4 e-tron takes 5.4 s. That’s about 0.8 s quicker.

There’s also a difference in torque: the Audi Q4 e-tron delivers marginally more torque with 679 Nm compared to 670 Nm. That’s about 9 Nm more.

EX40

Space and Everyday Use:

Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.

Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.

In terms of curb weight, Audi Q4 e-tron is very slightly lighter – 2,035 kg compared to 2,040 kg. The difference is around 5 kg.

Looking at boot space, the Audi Q4 e-tron offers noticeably more boot space – 535 L compared to 410 L. That’s a difference of about 125 L.

When it comes to payload, the Audi Q4 e-tron carries marginally more – 515 kg compared to 480 kg. That’s a difference of about 35 kg.

Who wins the race in the data check?

The Volvo EX40 holds a slight edge in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.

from £45,200
EX40

Volvo EX40

  • Engine Type : Electric
  • Transmission : Automatic
  • Drive Type : Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP : 238 - 442 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km : 16.6 - 17.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range : 477 - 576 km
details
Volvo EX40
Audi Q4 e-tron

Costs and Consumption
View detailed analysis

Engine and Performance
View detailed analysis

Dimensions and Body
View detailed analysis

Volvo EX40

The Volvo EX40 is a compact electric SUV that blends Scandinavian minimalism with a comfortable, high-quality interior suited to daily driving and longer trips. It prioritizes safety and intuitive technology, delivering a calm, refined experience that feels mature and easy to live with.

details
311247_XC40_Recharge
311246_XC40_Recharge
308521_Rear-wheel_drive_more_range_and_faster_charging_for_fully_electric_Volvo

Reviews Volvo EX40

4.5 (2 Reviews)
rate
Bent
16 May 2026, 19:14:01

Stable car and generally good build quality — but I hate the Google and infotainment systems, which both seem designed to irritate the user as much as possible.
I'm looking at a Toyota B4ZX AWD when the lease on my EX40 expires. I need to be able to tow 1,500 kg, but without going broke.

How do you mainly use this car? (optional): Family car
Efficiency / Consumption & Range
Comfort & Interior
Driving Fun / Performance
Technology & Infotainment
Safety
Practicality / Trunk & Everyday Use
Value for Money

Audi Q4 e-tron

The Audi Q4 e-tron blends Audi’s clean, modern styling with a practical, well-built interior, making it a refined option for buyers who want a premium electric compact SUV. It offers a quiet, composed ride and intuitive tech, so it’s well suited to daily commuting and family duties while keeping the switch to electric straightforward.

details
A213272_overfull
A213273_overfull
A213248_overfull
A213261_overfull
A213263_overfull
A213264_overfull

Reviews Audi Q4 e-tron

4.9 (2 Reviews)
rate

No reviews yet. Share your experience and help others decide.

Frequently compared as well

Audi Q4 e-tron
BMW iX1
VS
The Audi Q4 e-tron and BMW iX1 are compact electric SUVs that aim to balance everyday practicality with distinct brand characters — the Q4 e-tron leans toward refined comfort and a premium cabin, while the iX1 emphasizes sporty handling and tech-forward features. This comparison will walk you …
Volvo EX40
Volvo XC40
VS
The Volvo EX40 and Volvo XC40 put two sides of Volvo’s compact-SUV line-up head-to-head: the EX40 is a dedicated electric model focused on efficiency, range and modern tech, while the XC40 is a versatile compact SUV available with petrol, hybrid and electric options that delivers a more traditional …
Ford Explorer EV
Volvo EX40
VS
In one corner the burly, tech-heavy Ford Explorer EV tries to translate American SUV swagger into electric range and cargo-flex practicality, while the polished Volvo EX40 delivers Scandinavian poise, efficient packaging and a safety-first, city-friendly footprint. If you crave roomy presence and …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Skoda Elroq
VS
Deciding between the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Skoda Elroq comes down to whether you value Audi’s premium feel and refined driving experience or Skoda’s clever packaging and better value. The Q4 e-tron focuses on high-quality materials, tech and a composed ride, while the Elroq prioritises interior …
Audi Q4 e-tron
Kia EV3
VS
This comparison puts the Audi Q4 e-tron and the Kia EV3 head-to-head, contrasting Audi’s premium, tech-rich compact electric SUV with Kia’s practical, value-driven EV. Read on to see how they match up on range, comfort, features and running costs so you can choose the right electric car for your …
BMW iX1
Volvo EX40
VS
Choosing between the BMW iX1 and the Volvo EX40 comes down to whether you want a compact electric SUV that emphasizes BMW’s sporty, driver-focused dynamics or one that prioritizes Volvo’s calm, safety-minded comfort. Both deliver premium EV credentials, but they differ in ride character, interior …
Mercedes EQA
Volvo EX40
VS
The Mercedes EQA wraps premium Mercedes poise and MBUX polish into a compact EV that feels cosseting and refined, while the Volvo EX40 trades a bit of showroom gloss for Scandi practicality, airy space and a more efficient, no‑nonsense driving character. If you want badge and cabin glamour, go EQA; …
Audi Q4 e-tron
CUPRA Tavascan
VS
Here’s a head-to-head look at the Audi Q4 e-tron and the CUPRA Tavascan, two compact electric crossovers that blend practicality with distinctive styling. I’ll compare driving dynamics, range, interior quality and value to help you choose which fits your needs.
Volvo EX40
Audi Q4 e-tron

Costs and Consumption
Price
45,200 - 58,200 £
Price
40,700 - 53,100 £
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption L/100km
-
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.6 kWh/100km
Consumption kWh/100km
14.8 - 16.2 kWh/100km
Electric Range
477 - 576 km
Electric Range
440 - 592 km
Battery Capacity
-
Battery Capacity
-
co2
0 g/km
co2
0 g/km
Fuel tank capacity
-
Fuel tank capacity
-

Dimensions and Body
Body Type
SUV
Body Type
SUV
Seats
5
Seats
5
Doors
-
Doors
-
Curb weight
2,040 - 2,170 kg
Curb weight
2,035 - 2,235 kg
Trunk capacity
410 L
Trunk capacity
515 - 535 L
Length
-
Length
-
Width
1,863 mm
Width
1,865 mm
Height
-
Height
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Max trunk capacity
-
Payload
430 - 480 kg
Payload
505 - 515 kg

Engine and Performance
Engine Type
Electric
Engine Type
Electric
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission
Automatic
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
Power HP
204 - 340 HP
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.4 - 8.1 s
Max Speed
-
Max Speed
-
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
Torque
350 - 679 Nm
Number of Cylinders
-
Number of Cylinders
-
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
Power kW
150 - 250 kW
Engine capacity
-
Engine capacity
-

General
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
Model Year
2026
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
Brand
Volvo
Brand
Audi
What drivetrain options does the Volvo EX40 have?

The Volvo EX40 is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.