Compare performance, boot capacity, efficiency and price at a glance.
Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo EX40 or XPeng G6?
As the automotive world shifts gears toward sustainability, electric SUVs are gaining prominence. The Volvo EX40 and XPeng G6 are two stellar examples of this transition. Each brings its own unique blend of performance, technology, and eco-friendliness. Let's delve into a comparative analysis of these two automotive wonders.
The Volvo EX40 and XPeng G6 both exhibit striking design features, yet cater to different stylistic preferences. The EX40's dimensions are compact, measuring 4440 mm in length, 1863 mm in width, and 1647 mm in height, making it ideal for city driving. The G6, on the other hand, is more elongated at 4753 mm in length, combining robust styling with unprecedented interior space, given its width of 1920 mm and height of 1650 mm.
Performance is crucial for any SUV enthusiast, electric or otherwise. The EX40 offers a range of power outputs from 238 HP to a substantial 408 HP with an exhilarating acceleration of 0-100 km/h in just 4.6 seconds for its highest variant. The G6 rivals this with impressive outputs between 258 HP and 476 HP, and a blistering acceleration of 4.1 seconds for the top model.
Both vehicles boast automatic transmissions. The EX40 features a reduction gearbox, known for smooth power delivery, while XPeng focuses on ease of driving with standard automatic transmission systems.
Range anxiety is a common concern for electric vehicle drivers, but both these SUVs offer reassuring numbers. The Volvo EX40 provides an electric range between 479 km and 576 km, while the XPeng G6 answers this with ranges from 435 km to 570 km. Their efficiency is further highlighted by energy consumption figures: EX40 consumes between 16.6 kWh and 17.6 kWh per 100 km, whereas G6 consumes slightly higher, from 17.5 kWh to 17.9 kWh.
Battery capacities play a role here, with Volvo offering options from 67 kWh to 79 kWh, while XPeng exceeds this with options up to 87.5 kWh.
Technology and innovations can significantly enhance the driving experience. The EX40 integrates Volvo's renowned safety features and a modern infotainment system that keeps you connected on-the-go. Meanwhile, the G6 emphasizes cutting-edge driver-assistance systems, ensuring a safer and more intuitive driving experience ideally suited to its tech-savvy clientele.
Passenger comfort is a priority for both models, offering seating for five. The Volvo EX40 provides a trunk capacity of 410 liters, suitable for city adventures. XPeng G6, with a substantial 571 liters of cargo space, caters to those requiring more room on long journeys or for more active lifestyles.
Choosing between Volvo EX40 and XPeng G6 depends largely on personal preference. The EX40 promises a classic Volvo experience with efficient performance, while the G6 makes a strong case with its technological prowess and increased range. Both epitomize the forward-thinking nature of modern electric SUVs – each delivering in unique ways on the promise of emission-free driving.
Price and efficiency are key factors when choosing a car – and this is often where the real differences emerge.
XPeng G6 has a minimal advantage in terms of price – it starts at 40800 £, while the Volvo EX40 costs 42800 £. That’s a price difference of around 2048 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Volvo EX40: with 16.60 kWh per 100 km, it’s minimal more efficient than the XPeng G6 with 17.50 kWh. That’s a difference of about 0.90 kWh.
As for range, the Volvo EX40 performs hardly perceptible better – achieving up to 576 km, about 51 km more than the XPeng G6.
Under the bonnet, it becomes clear which model is tuned for sportiness and which one takes the lead when you hit the accelerator.
When it comes to engine power, the XPeng G6 has a hardly perceptible edge – offering 487 HP compared to 442 HP. That’s roughly 45 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the XPeng G6 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 4.10 s, while the Volvo EX40 takes 4.60 s. That’s about 0.50 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the XPeng G6 performs hardly perceptible better – reaching 200 km/h, while the Volvo EX40 tops out at 180 km/h. The difference is around 20 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: Volvo EX40 pulls hardly perceptible stronger with 670 Nm compared to 660 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm difference.
Beyond pure performance, interior space and usability matter most in daily life. This is where you see which car is more practical and versatile.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Volvo EX40 is slight lighter – 2040 kg compared to 2115 kg. The difference is around 75 kg.
In terms of boot space, the XPeng G6 offers distinct more room – 571 L compared to 410 L. That’s a difference of about 161 L.
In maximum load capacity, the Volvo EX40 performs hardly perceptible better – up to 1400 L, which is about 26 L more than the XPeng G6.
When it comes to payload, Volvo EX40 minimal takes the win – 480 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 5 kg.
The XPeng G6 proves to be performs better in key areas and therefore becomes our DriveDuel Champion!
XPeng G6 is the better all-rounder in this comparison.
@ XPeng Motors
The Volvo EX40 wraps Scandinavian calm and clever practicality into a compact electric package that feels both premium and refreshingly uncomplicated. It's the grown-up answer to flashier rivals — a safe, comfy, and city-friendly EV with thoughtful tech that makes everyday driving quietly satisfying.
details
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
@ Volvo Cars
The XPeng G6 looks like a sleeker, tech-rich alternative to conventional electric SUVs, with an interior that feels modern, airy and purposefully designed for everyday comfort. On the road it’s composed and surprisingly engaging, giving drivers a smart mix of calm refinement and a playful streak — not bad for a car that quietly challenges the usual premium suspects.
details
@ XPeng Motors
@ XPeng Motors
|
@ Volvo Cars
|
@ XPeng Motors
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
42800 - 58200 £
|
Price
40800 - 44200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.6 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.5 - 18.4 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
480 - 576 km
|
Electric Range
510 - 525 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
67 - 79 kWh
|
Battery Capacity
80 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
2040 - 2170 kg
|
Curb weight
2115 - 2220 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
410 L
|
Trunk capacity
571 L
|
|
Length
4440 mm
|
Length
4758 mm
|
|
Width
1863 mm
|
Width
1920 mm
|
|
Height
1647 mm
|
Height
1650 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1286 - 1400 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1374 L
|
|
Payload
430 - 480 kg
|
Payload
470 - 475 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
Power HP
296 - 487 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 6.7 s
|
|
Max Speed
180 km/h
|
Max Speed
200 km/h
|
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
Torque
440 - 660 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
Power kW
218 - 358 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2024
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Brand
XPeng
|
The Volvo EX40 is available as Rear-Wheel Drive or All-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España