Compare performance (442 HP vs 487 HP), boot space and price (45,200 £ vs 37,400 £ ) at a glance. Find out which car is the better choice for you – Volvo EX40 or XPeng G6?
All details on performance, efficiency, range and trunk space can be found in the technical comparison below – including user reviews for both models.
As the automotive world shifts gears toward sustainability, electric SUVs are gaining prominence. The Volvo EX40 and XPeng G6 are two stellar examples of this transition. Each brings its own unique blend of performance, technology, and eco-friendliness. Let's delve into a comparative analysis of these two automotive wonders.
The Volvo EX40 and XPeng G6 both exhibit striking design features, yet cater to different stylistic preferences. The EX40's dimensions are compact, measuring 4440 mm in length, 1863 mm in width, and 1647 mm in height, making it ideal for city driving. The G6, on the other hand, is more elongated at 4753 mm in length, combining robust styling with unprecedented interior space, given its width of 1920 mm and height of 1650 mm.
Performance is crucial for any SUV enthusiast, electric or otherwise. The EX40 offers a range of power outputs from 238 HP to a substantial 408 HP with an exhilarating acceleration of 0-100 km/h in just 4.6 seconds for its highest variant. The G6 rivals this with impressive outputs between 258 HP and 476 HP, and a blistering acceleration of 4.1 seconds for the top model.
Both vehicles boast automatic transmissions. The EX40 features a reduction gearbox, known for smooth power delivery, while XPeng focuses on ease of driving with standard automatic transmission systems.
Range anxiety is a common concern for electric vehicle drivers, but both these SUVs offer reassuring numbers. The Volvo EX40 provides an electric range between 479 km and 576 km, while the XPeng G6 answers this with ranges from 435 km to 570 km. Their efficiency is further highlighted by energy consumption figures: EX40 consumes between 16.6 kWh and 17.6 kWh per 100 km, whereas G6 consumes slightly higher, from 17.5 kWh to 17.9 kWh.
Battery capacities play a role here, with Volvo offering options from 67 kWh to 79 kWh, while XPeng exceeds this with options up to 87.5 kWh.
Technology and innovations can significantly enhance the driving experience. The EX40 integrates Volvo's renowned safety features and a modern infotainment system that keeps you connected on-the-go. Meanwhile, the G6 emphasizes cutting-edge driver-assistance systems, ensuring a safer and more intuitive driving experience ideally suited to its tech-savvy clientele.
Passenger comfort is a priority for both models, offering seating for five. The Volvo EX40 provides a trunk capacity of 410 liters, suitable for city adventures. XPeng G6, with a substantial 571 liters of cargo space, caters to those requiring more room on long journeys or for more active lifestyles.
Choosing between Volvo EX40 and XPeng G6 depends largely on personal preference. The EX40 promises a classic Volvo experience with efficient performance, while the G6 makes a strong case with its technological prowess and increased range. Both epitomize the forward-thinking nature of modern electric SUVs – each delivering in unique ways on the promise of emission-free driving.
When it comes to price and running costs, the biggest differences usually appear. This is often where you see which car fits your budget better in the long run.
XPeng G6 is visibly cheaper – starting at 37,400 £ , while the Volvo EX40 costs 45,200 £ . That’s a price difference of around 7,877 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the Volvo EX40 is very slightly more efficient: consuming 16.6 kWh/100km compared to 17.3 kWh/100km for the XPeng G6. That’s a difference of about 0.7 kWh/100km.
As for electric range, the Volvo EX40 offers very slightly more range – reaching up to 576 km, about 51 km more than the XPeng G6.
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the XPeng G6 offers barely more power – delivering 487 HP compared to 442 HP. That’s roughly 45 HP more horsepower.
When accelerating from 0 to 100 km/h, the XPeng G6 is somewhat quicker – completing the sprint in 4.1 s, while the Volvo EX40 takes 4.6 s. That’s about 0.5 s quicker.
There’s also a difference in torque: the Volvo EX40 delivers barely more torque with 670 Nm compared to 660 Nm. That’s about 10 Nm more.
Cabin size, boot volume and payload all play a role in everyday practicality. Here, comfort and flexibility make the difference.
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In terms of curb weight, Volvo EX40 is only slightly lighter – 2,040 kg compared to 2,065 kg. The difference is around 25 kg.
Looking at boot space, the XPeng G6 offers clearly more boot space – 571 L compared to 410 L. That’s a difference of about 161 L.
When it comes to payload, the Volvo EX40 carries very slightly more – 480 kg compared to 475 kg. That’s a difference of about 5 kg.
The XPeng G6 is clearly superior overall in the objective data comparison.
This result only shows which model scores more points on paper – not which of the two cars feels right for you.
The Volvo EX40 wraps Scandinavian calm and clever practicality into a compact electric package that feels both premium and refreshingly uncomplicated. It's the grown-up answer to flashier rivals — a safe, comfy, and city-friendly EV with thoughtful tech that makes everyday driving quietly satisfying.
details
The XPeng G6 looks like a sleeker, tech-rich alternative to conventional electric SUVs, with an interior that feels modern, airy and purposefully designed for everyday comfort. On the road it’s composed and surprisingly engaging, giving drivers a smart mix of calm refinement and a playful streak — not bad for a car that quietly challenges the usual premium suspects.
details
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
45,200 - 58,200 £
|
Price
37,400 - 44,200 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16.6 - 17.6 kWh/100km
|
Consumption kWh/100km
17.3 - 18.4 kWh/100km
|
|
Electric Range
477 - 576 km
|
Electric Range
455 - 525 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
-
|
Doors
-
|
|
Curb weight
2,040 - 2,170 kg
|
Curb weight
2,065 - 2,220 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
410 L
|
Trunk capacity
571 L
|
|
Length
-
|
Length
-
|
|
Width
1,863 mm
|
Width
1,920 mm
|
|
Height
-
|
Height
-
|
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
Max trunk capacity
-
|
|
Payload
430 - 480 kg
|
Payload
470 - 475 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
238 - 442 HP
|
Power HP
252 - 487 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.6 - 7.3 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
4.1 - 6.9 s
|
|
Max Speed
-
|
Max Speed
-
|
|
Torque
420 - 670 Nm
|
Torque
440 - 660 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
|
Power kW
175 - 325 kW
|
Power kW
185 - 358 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
-
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2,024 - 2,026
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
|
Brand
Volvo
|
Brand
XPeng
|
Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
España