Mazda CX-30 alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Mazda CX-30, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

Mazda CX-30

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Mazda CX-30 and are good next research steps.

from £38,700
UX

Lexus UX

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 199 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5 - 5.6 L/100km
details

Lexus UX as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-30

The Lexus UX and Mazda CX-30 are two compact crossovers that target different buyers: the UX prioritizes premium feel and comfort, while the CX-30 focuses on engaging driving dynamics and value. This comparison will highlight how they stack up in design, interior quality, tech, safety and running costs so you can decide which suits your daily needs.

The Lexus UX is a compact luxury crossover that blends sharp styling with a quiet, comfortable cabin, perfect for urban buyers who want premium feel without shouting about it. It rides with poise, serves up plush materials and thoughtful tech, and—while it won’t satisfy anyone chasing track thrills—it's a smart, stylish choice for everyday driving.

Quick data check: Lexus UX

  • considerably cheaper
  • barely lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
  • barely more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
Compare directly with Lexus UX
from £29,600
Qashqai

Nissan Qashqai

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 158 - 205 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.3 - 6.8 L/100km
details

Nissan Qashqai as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX‑30 feels like a premium compact with sharp handling, a beautifully finished interior and a focus on driver enjoyment, while the Nissan Qashqai answers with roomy practicality, comfort and sensible tech for everyday family life. Choose the CX‑30 if you want style and engagement; pick the Qashqai if space, ease and lower running costs top your list — sensible, dependable and a little less demanding.

The Nissan Qashqai is a compact crossover that blends everyday practicality with a comfortable, composed driving experience and a smart, well finished interior. It feels sensible and versatile for city life and longer trips, appealing to buyers who want a reliable, low fuss family car.

Quick data check: Nissan Qashqai

  • a bit cheaper
  • marginally more power
  • clearly more efficient
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • barely lighter
  • slightly more trunk space
Compare directly with Nissan Qashqai
from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 404 - 417 km
details

Ford Puma as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-30

In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; pick the CX-30 if you want a quieter, classier drive and don’t mind paying a little extra for the nicer finish.

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

Quick data check: Ford Puma

  • marginally more power
  • very slightly cheaper
  • very slightly more efficient
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit lighter
  • slightly more trunk space
Compare directly with Ford Puma
from £26,400
T-Roc

VW T-Roc

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
details

VW T-Roc as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 and the VW T‑Roc are compact crossovers that each aim to combine everyday practicality with a touch of style, but they take different routes on ride feel, interior quality and tech. This quick comparison will help you decide whether the CX-30’s near-premium cabin and engaging driving character or the T‑Roc’s roominess and value-orientated packaging better fits your priorities.

The Volkswagen T‑Roc is a stylish, well-proportioned crossover that blends hatchback agility with SUV presence. It delivers a comfortable cabin, user-friendly tech and a composed ride, making it a sensible choice for buyers who want practicality with a bit of character.

Quick data check: VW T-Roc

  • barely cheaper
  • somewhat more power
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
  • marginally more efficient
  • barely more trunk space
Compare directly with VW T-Roc
from £29,100
HR-V

Honda HR-V

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 131 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 L/100km
details

Honda HR-V as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-30

In the competitive subcompact SUV segment, the Honda HR-V and Mazda CX-30 stand out for their unique appeal and driving dynamics. While the HR-V offers a spacious interior and versatile cargo options, the CX-30 impresses with its upscale cabin and engaging handling. Ultimately, your choice between these two models will hinge on whether you prioritize practicality or a more spirited driving experience.

The Honda HR-V is a compact crossover that blends practical versatility with a comfortable, refined cabin, making it a strong choice for daily driving and weekend trips. Its clever packaging and easy-to-use features give owners flexible cargo space and a confidence-inspiring driving experience without feeling fussy.

Quick data check: Honda HR-V

  • a bit cheaper
  • visibly more power
  • markedly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • markedly more trunk space
  • very slightly more efficient
  • barely lighter
Compare directly with Honda HR-V
from £23,100
XCeed

Kia XCeed

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 180 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 6.3 - 6.8 L/100km
details

Kia XCeed as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-30

In the competitive compact crossover segment, the Kia XCeed stands out with its sporty design and a rich set of standard features, providing a more youthful and contemporary driving experience. Meanwhile, the Mazda CX-30 delivers a premium feel with its upscale interior, engaging handling, and strong performance, catering to those seeking a more dynamic ride. Both models offer distinctive qualities, where the XCeed excels in practicality and tech offerings, while the CX-30 impresses with its refined driving capabilities.

Kia XCeed blends hatchback agility with a coupe-like stance, wrapping practical space in a handsome, modern package that punches above its class in style. It’s an easygoing everyday companion — comfy, well-equipped and priced to make sensible buyers smile — with just enough spark to keep weekend drives interesting.

Quick data check: Kia XCeed

  • very slightly more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally more trunk space
  • a bit cheaper
  • very slightly lighter
Compare directly with Kia XCeed

Direct comparisons

These comparison pages show the Mazda CX-30 head-to-head against similar models.

Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30
VS
Mazda CX-30
Nissan Qashqai
VS
Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
Mazda CX-30
VW T-Roc
VS
Honda HR-V
Mazda CX-30
VS
Kia XCeed
Mazda CX-30
VS

Further pages

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.