Mazda CX-30 alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Mazda CX-30, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

Mazda CX-30

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Mazda CX-30 and are good next research steps.

from £23,900
Puma

Ford Puma

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV, Electric
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 125 - 168 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.4 - 5.9 L/100km
  • Consumption kWh/100km 13 - 13.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 404 - 417 km
details

Ford Puma as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-30

In the tussle between the cheeky Ford Puma and the stylish Mazda CX-30, the Puma serves up playful handling, clever practicality and sharper value, while the CX-30 rewards you with a more premium cabin and composed, grown-up refinement. Choose the Puma for everyday fun and sensible running costs; pick the CX-30 if you want a quieter, classier drive and don’t mind paying a little extra for the nicer finish.

The Ford Puma blends sporty styling with practical everyday usability, making it a smart choice for drivers who want flair without sacrificing versatility. Its engaging driving character and clever interior packaging give it a more dynamic and useful feel than many rivals.

Quick data check: Ford Puma

  • marginally more power
  • very slightly cheaper
  • very slightly more efficient
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • a bit lighter
  • slightly more trunk space
Compare directly with Ford Puma
from £21,800
S-Cross

Suzuki S-Cross

  • Engine Type Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 110 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.3 - 5.8 L/100km
details

Suzuki S-Cross as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-30

If you want a small SUV that actually feels like a car, the Mazda CX‑30 wins hearts with taut handling, upscale interior materials and a sharper, more rewarding drive. The Suzuki S‑Cross is the sensible sibling — roomier, cheaper to run and easier on the wallet, making it the smarter pick for families who prefer practicality over pizzazz.

The Suzuki S-Cross is a practical, well-built compact crossover that puts comfort, efficiency and everyday reliability first. With a roomy cabin, straightforward technology and sensible design, it’s a no-nonsense choice for buyers seeking a versatile family car.

Quick data check: Suzuki S-Cross

  • considerably more power
  • somewhat cheaper
  • barely more efficient
  • somewhat lighter
Compare directly with Suzuki S-Cross
from £38,700
UX

Lexus UX

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 199 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5 - 5.6 L/100km
details

Lexus UX as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-30

The Lexus UX and Mazda CX-30 are two compact crossovers that target different buyers: the UX prioritizes premium feel and comfort, while the CX-30 focuses on engaging driving dynamics and value. This comparison will highlight how they stack up in design, interior quality, tech, safety and running costs so you can decide which suits your daily needs.

The Lexus UX is a compact luxury crossover that blends sharp styling with a quiet, comfortable cabin, perfect for urban buyers who want premium feel without shouting about it. It rides with poise, serves up plush materials and thoughtful tech, and—while it won’t satisfy anyone chasing track thrills—it's a smart, stylish choice for everyday driving.

Quick data check: Lexus UX

  • considerably cheaper
  • barely lighter
  • clearly more trunk space
  • barely more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
Compare directly with Lexus UX
from £28,300
LBX

Lexus LBX

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 136 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 4.5 - 4.8 L/100km
details

Lexus LBX as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-30

Choosing between the Lexus LBX and the Mazda CX‑30? The LBX leans on premium materials, comfort and Lexus refinement, while the CX‑30 delivers sporty handling, strong value and practical everyday usability — I’ll compare how they stack up on space, driving feel, tech and ownership to help you decide.

The Lexus LBX is a compact premium crossover that brings Lexus styling and craftsmanship to city driving, pairing a cozy interior with thoughtful tech and upscale materials. It focuses on a quiet, refined ride and fuel-efficient everyday usability while carrying the brand’s familiar emphasis on comfort and safety.

Quick data check: Lexus LBX

  • moderately cheaper
  • noticeably more power
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
  • noticeably more trunk space
  • markedly more efficient
  • somewhat lighter
Compare directly with Lexus LBX
from £26,400
T-Roc

VW T-Roc

  • Engine Type Petrol, Petrol MHEV
  • Transmission Manuel, Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 115 - 150 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 5.5 - 6.3 L/100km
details

VW T-Roc as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-30

The Mazda CX-30 and the VW T‑Roc are compact crossovers that each aim to combine everyday practicality with a touch of style, but they take different routes on ride feel, interior quality and tech. This quick comparison will help you decide whether the CX-30’s near-premium cabin and engaging driving character or the T‑Roc’s roominess and value-orientated packaging better fits your priorities.

The Volkswagen T‑Roc is a stylish, well-proportioned crossover that blends hatchback agility with SUV presence. It delivers a comfortable cabin, user-friendly tech and a composed ride, making it a sensible choice for buyers who want practicality with a bit of character.

Quick data check: VW T-Roc

  • barely cheaper
  • somewhat more power
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly lighter
  • marginally more efficient
  • barely more trunk space
Compare directly with VW T-Roc
from £29,100
C-HR

Toyota C-HR

  • Engine Type Full Hybrid, Plugin Hybrid
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 140 - 223 HP
  • Consumption L/100km 2.3 - 5.1 L/100km
  • Electric Range 66 km
details

Toyota C-HR as a suitable alternative to Mazda CX-30

In the battle of subcompact SUVs, the Mazda CX-30 showcases a sleek design and spirited driving dynamics that appeal to enthusiasts, while the Toyota C-HR offers a bold aesthetic and a reputation for reliability. The CX-30 impresses with its upscale interior and advanced infotainment features, making it a strong contender for those seeking a premium feel. On the other hand, the C-HR excels in safety ratings and fuel efficiency, catering to buyers who prioritize practicality and value.

The Toyota C-HR is a bold, coupe-styled crossover that grabs attention with angular lines and a modern interior design. It’s aimed at comfortable urban driving and sensible efficiency, offering practical features and distinctive looks rather than rugged off-road ability.

Quick data check: Toyota C-HR

  • a bit cheaper
  • marginally lighter
  • somewhat more power
  • substantially more efficient
  • moderately quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly more trunk space
Compare directly with Toyota C-HR

Direct comparisons

These comparison pages show the Mazda CX-30 head-to-head against similar models.

Ford Puma
Mazda CX-30
VS
Mazda CX-30
Suzuki S-Cross
VS
Lexus UX
Mazda CX-30
VS
Lexus LBX
Mazda CX-30
VS
Mazda CX-30
VW T-Roc
VS
Mazda CX-30
Toyota C-HR
VS

Further pages

DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.