Deutschland
France
Nederland
Great Britain
Sverige
Norge
Danmark
Suomi
Italia
Polska
EspañaVS
BYD Atto 3 vs Ford Puma – Performance, range & efficiency compared
Everyday use, family trips or long-distance drives – here’s where the differences show.
Discover whether BYD Atto 3 or Ford Puma fits your lifestyle better.
Atto 3
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
Costs and Efficiency:
Price and efficiency are often the first things buyers look at. Here it becomes clear which model has the long-term edge – whether at the pump, the plug, or in purchase price.
Ford Puma has a clearly perceptible advantage in terms of price – it starts at 24800 £, while the BYD Atto 3 costs 33400 £. That’s a price difference of around 8649 £.
In terms of energy consumption, the advantage goes to the Ford Puma: with 13.10 kWh per 100 km, it’s noticeable more efficient than the BYD Atto 3 with 16 kWh. That’s a difference of about 2.90 kWh.
As for range, the BYD Atto 3 performs somewhat better – achieving up to 420 km, about 44 km more than the Ford Puma.
Puma
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Engine and Performance:
Power, torque and acceleration say a lot about how a car feels on the road. This is where you see which model delivers more driving dynamics.
When it comes to engine power, the BYD Atto 3 has a a bit edge – offering 204 HP compared to 168 HP. That’s roughly 36 HP more horsepower.
In acceleration from 0 to 100 km/h, the BYD Atto 3 is slight quicker – completing the sprint in 7.30 s, while the Ford Puma takes 7.40 s. That’s about 0.10 s faster.
In terms of top speed, the Ford Puma performs clearly perceptible better – reaching 210 km/h, while the BYD Atto 3 tops out at 160 km/h. The difference is around 50 km/h.
There’s also a difference in torque: BYD Atto 3 pulls minimal stronger with 310 Nm compared to 290 Nm. That’s about 20 Nm difference.
Atto 3
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
Space and Everyday Use:
Whether family car or daily driver – which one offers more room, flexibility and comfort?
Both vehicles offer seating for 5 people.
In curb weight, Ford Puma is noticeable lighter – 1316 kg compared to 1825 kg. The difference is around 509 kg.
In terms of boot space, the Ford Puma offers somewhat more room – 523 L compared to 440 L. That’s a difference of about 83 L.
In maximum load capacity, the BYD Atto 3 performs minimal better – up to 1338 L, which is about 55 L more than the Ford Puma.
When it comes to payload, Ford Puma distinct takes the win – 469 kg compared to 335 kg. That’s a difference of about 134 kg.
Who comes out on top?
Overall, the Ford Puma shows itself to be outperforms in nearly all aspects and secures the title of DriveDuel Champion.
It convinces with the more balanced overall package and proves to be the more versatile choice for everyday use.
from about £24,800
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
Ford Puma
BYD Atto 3
The BYD Atto 3 mixes quirky crossover styling with a cleverly packaged interior that feels more premium than its price suggests. Easy to drive, surprisingly practical and loaded with user-friendly tech, it's a strong choice for buyers who want an EV that's fun without being fussy.
details
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
Ford Puma
The Ford Puma is a cheeky compact crossover that blends sporty styling with city-friendly practicality, giving drivers a surprisingly fun and composed ride. With clever storage tricks and a lively personality, it’s a smart pick for buyers who want enjoyment without fuss.
details
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
BYD Atto 3
Ford Puma
|
@ BYD Auto / BYD Global Media
|
@ Ford Motor Company / Ford Media Center
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
|---|---|
|
Price
33400 - 35100 £
|
Price
24800 - 36300 £
|
|
Consumption L/100km
-
|
Consumption L/100km
5.4 - 5.9 L
|
|
Consumption kWh/100km
16 kWh
|
Consumption kWh/100km
13.1 - 13.9 kWh
|
|
Electric Range
420 km
|
Electric Range
361 - 376 km
|
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
43 kWh
|
|
co2
0 g/km
|
co2
0 - 135 g/km
|
|
Fuel tank capacity
-
|
Fuel tank capacity
42 L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
|---|---|
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Body Type
SUV
|
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
|
Curb weight
1825 kg
|
Curb weight
1316 - 1563 kg
|
|
Trunk capacity
440 L
|
Trunk capacity
456 - 523 L
|
|
Length
4455 mm
|
Length
4186 - 4226 mm
|
|
Width
1875 mm
|
Width
1805 mm
|
|
Height
1615 mm
|
Height
1550 - 1555 mm
|
|
Max trunk capacity
1338 L
|
Max trunk capacity
1216 - 1283 L
|
|
Payload
335 kg
|
Payload
367 - 469 kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
|---|---|
|
Engine Type
Electric
|
Engine Type
Electric, Petrol MHEV
|
|
Transmission
Automatic
|
Transmission
Automatic, Manuel
|
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox
|
Transmission Detail
Reduction Gearbox, Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
|
Power HP
204 HP
|
Power HP
125 - 168 HP
|
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.30 s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7.4 - 9.8 s
|
|
Max Speed
160 km/h
|
Max Speed
160 - 210 km/h
|
|
Torque
310 Nm
|
Torque
170 - 290 Nm
|
|
Number of Cylinders
-
|
Number of Cylinders
3
|
|
Power kW
150 kW
|
Power kW
92 - 124 kW
|
|
Engine capacity
-
|
Engine capacity
999 cm3
|
General |
|
|---|---|
|
Model Year
2023
|
Model Year
2025
|
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
A, D
|
|
Brand
BYD
|
Brand
Ford
|
What drive types are available for the BYD Atto 3?
The BYD Atto 3 is available as Front-Wheel Drive.
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.