In the showdown between the Ford Focus and the Škoda Karoq, buyers are treated to an impressive blend of performance and practicality. The Focus stands out with its dynamic handling and engaging driving experience, making it a favorite for enthusiasts. Meanwhile, the Karoq excels in versatility and space, offering families a well-rounded SUV that doesn’t compromise on comfort or features.
When it comes to choosing a new car, the Ford Focus and Skoda Karoq are two strong contenders in their respective segments. The Focus is an agile hatchback, while the Karoq represents the ever-popular SUV market. Both vehicles boast a range of modern features, performances, and innovations that cater to different driver preferences. In this article, we delve into a detailed comparison of these two models, focusing on their technical aspects and innovative features.
The Ford Focus showcases a dynamic and sporty hatchback silhouette, measuring approximately 4392mm in length and 1825mm in width. It stands at a height of 1440mm, providing a compact yet spacious cabin for its five passengers.
On the other hand, the Skoda Karoq flaunts its SUV stature with a length of around 4390mm, width of 1841mm, and a notably taller height that ranges from 1603mm to 1624mm. This height advantage translates into a more commanding driving position, ensuring greater visibility on the road.
The Ford Focus offers a diverse range of engines, including petrol MHEV, petrol, and diesel options, delivering power outputs from 115HP to an impressive 280HP. Its acceleration varies from 5.7 seconds for the performance-oriented variant to a more leisurely 11.8 seconds for the base model. The Focus utilizes a front-wheel-drive system, offering a balanced driving experience and an agile response.
Conversely, the Skoda Karoq features petrol and diesel engines with power outputs ranging from 115HP to 190HP. While its acceleration is competitive, spanning from 7 seconds for the sporty versions to a modest 10.6 seconds for base variants, the Karoq comes with both front and all-wheel-drive options, enhancing its versatility on different terrains.
Fuel consumption is a crucial factor for many buyers. The Ford Focus demonstrates efficiency with figures ranging from 4.9 to 8 L/100km, depending on the engine and configuration. With CO2 emissions between 117 to 183 g/km, it performs reasonably well in terms of environmental friendliness.
The Skoda Karoq also shines in this department, thanks to its efficient engine design. It offers consumption rates from 4.9 to 7.6 L/100km, with CO2 emissions hovering between 129 to 174 g/km. This makes the Karoq an attractive option for those concerned about their carbon footprint.
Ford has equipped the Focus with cutting-edge technology aimed at enhancing both safety and connectivity. Advanced driver-assistance systems, including lane-keeping assistance and adaptive cruise control, are standard in many models, ensuring a seamless driving experience.
The Skoda Karoq, known for its practicality, offers features such as VarioFlex seating, which allows for versatile cargo configurations and an impressive trunk capacity of 521 liters. This SUV also integrates a comprehensive infotainment system that supports smartphone connectivity, enhancing the driving experience.
Inside the Ford Focus, you’ll find high-quality materials and an intuitive layout. While the hatchback may appear compact, it offers substantial space for passengers and their belongings, with a trunk capacity of 392 liters.
In stark contrast, the Skoda Karoq excels in interior space, providing generous legroom and headroom for all five occupants. Its larger trunk capacity, backed by innovative seating solutions, ensures it remains a practical choice for families or those needing extra carrying capacity.
In summary, the battle between the Ford Focus and Skoda Karoq boils down to individual preferences. The Ford Focus is an excellent option for those who value a sporty drive, innovative technology, and compact dimensions. Meanwhile, the Skoda Karoq stands out with its versatile interior, ample cargo space, and family-friendly features. Both vehicles have much to offer; the decision ultimately hinges on the buyer’s priorities in style, space, and driving dynamics.
|
|
|
|
Costs and Consumption |
|
---|---|
Price
about 27500 - 42700
£
|
Price
about 28400 - 41000
£
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 8
L
|
Consumption L/100km
4.9 - 7.6
L
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Consumption kWh/100km
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Electric Range
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
Battery Capacity
-
|
co2
117 - 183
g/km
|
co2
129 - 174
g/km
|
Fuel tank capacity
52
L
|
Fuel tank capacity
50 - 55
L
|
Dimensions and Body |
|
Body Type
Hatchback
|
Body Type
SUV
|
Seats
5
|
Seats
5
|
Doors
5
|
Doors
5
|
Curb weight
1330 - 1529
kg
|
Curb weight
1364 - 1608
kg
|
Trunk capacity
392
L
|
Trunk capacity
521
L
|
Length
4382 - 4397
mm
|
Length
4384 - 4390
mm
|
Width
1825 - 1844
mm
|
Width
1841
mm
|
Height
1438 - 1482
mm
|
Height
1603 - 1624
mm
|
Payload
495 - 560
kg
|
Payload
426 - 573
kg
|
Engine and Performance |
|
Engine Type
Petrol MHEV, Diesel, Petrol
|
Engine Type
Petrol, Diesel
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission
Manuel, Automatic
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic, Automatic Gearbox, Schaltgetriebe, Automat. Schaltgetriebe (Doppelkupplung), Automatikgetriebe
|
Transmission Detail
Manual Gearbox, Dual-Clutch Automatic
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive
|
Drive Type
Front-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
|
Power HP
115 - 280
HP
|
Power HP
115 - 190
HP
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
5.7 - 11.8
s
|
Acceleration 0-100km/h
7 - 10.6
s
|
Max Speed
186 - 250
km/h
|
Max Speed
193 - 221
km/h
|
Torque
170 - 420
Nm
|
Torque
200 - 360
Nm
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Number of Cylinders
3 - 4
|
Power kW
85 - 206
kW
|
Power kW
85 - 140
kW
|
Engine capacity
999 - 2261
cm3
|
Engine capacity
999 - 1984
cm3
|
Top speed
186 - 250
km/h
|
Top speed
193 - 221
km/h
|
General |
|
Model Year
2022 - 2024
|
Model Year
2024
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, G
|
CO2 Efficiency Class
D, E, F
|
Brand
Ford
|
Brand
Skoda
|
The prices and data displayed are estimates based on German list prices and may vary by country. This information is not legally binding.