Volvo EX60 alternatives & comparisons

Here you can find alternatives to the Volvo EX60, based on existing comparison pages and popular model matchups. We currently show 6 suitable models as a starting point for your buying decision.

Volvo EX60

Alternative models

These models are frequently compared with the Volvo EX60 and are good next research steps.

from £72,200
EX90

Volvo EX90

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 333 - 680 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.8 - 19.3 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 570 - 620 km

Volvo EX90 as a suitable alternative to Volvo EX60

The Volvo EX90 and Volvo EX60 are Volvo's all-electric SUVs aimed at different buyers: the EX90 is the flagship full-size model focused on maximum space, safety and cutting-edge tech, while the EX60 is a mid-size alternative that prioritizes efficiency, agility and value. This comparison cuts through specifications and real-world driving traits to highlight the practical differences in space, range, performance and features so you can pick the right Volvo for your needs.

The Volvo EX90 feels like a Scandinavian fortress on wheels, combining serene luxury with smart safety features that make everyday driving remarkably calm and confident. It dresses cutting-edge electric technology in understated elegance, so buyers who want peace of mind without shouting about it will find it hard to resist.

Quick data check: Volvo EX90

  • visibly cheaper
  • slightly more efficient
  • noticeably more electric range
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • somewhat lighter
from £54,300
iX3

BMW iX3

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type All-Wheel Drive, Rear-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 320 - 469 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 14.6 - 15.1 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 635 - 805 km

BMW iX3 as a suitable alternative to Volvo EX60

The BMW iX3 and Volvo EX60 represent two different takes on the compact electric SUV: BMW focuses on driving dynamics and efficiency, while Volvo emphasizes safety, interior comfort and tech. This short comparison will show where each model shines so you can choose which suits your priorities.

The BMW iX3 is an electric SUV that delivers the composed, premium driving experience BMW buyers expect. With a calm, refined cabin and practical everyday usability, it’s a strong choice for those who want electric motoring without giving up luxury and comfort.

Quick data check: BMW iX3

  • only slightly cheaper
  • visibly more power
  • very slightly more electric range
  • visibly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • only slightly lighter
  • only slightly more efficient
from £45,200
EX40

Volvo EX40

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 238 - 442 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 16.6 - 17.6 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 477 - 576 km

Volvo EX40 as a suitable alternative to Volvo EX60

Volvo’s EX40 and EX60 lock horns in a neatly staged duel: the nimble EX40 is a city-savvy, efficiency-first EV built for tight streets and savvy budgets, while the larger EX60 brings more space, stronger performance and longer range for family life and weekend escapes. Pick this showdown for a clear answer to whether you want compact convenience or roomy ambition — with Scandinavian calm and a dash of electric grin.

The Volvo EX40 is a compact electric SUV that blends Scandinavian minimalism with a comfortable, high-quality interior suited to daily driving and longer trips. It prioritizes safety and intuitive technology, delivering a calm, refined experience that feels mature and easy to live with.

Quick data check: Volvo EX40

  • markedly more power
  • moderately more efficient
  • visibly more electric range
  • slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • clearly more trunk space
  • somewhat cheaper
  • barely lighter
from £53,100
4

Polestar 4

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 272 - 544 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.8 - 19 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 590 - 620 km

Polestar 4 as a suitable alternative to Volvo EX60

Polestar 4 and Volvo EX60 go head-to-head in a clash of Scandinavian design, tech and electric muscle — one is a sporty provocateur, the other a polished family flagship. Time to find out which brings the sharper drive, smarter cabin and better real-world value for buyers who want style with substance.

The Polestar 4 wears a coupe-like profile and a Scandinavian-minimal interior that feels premium and unexpectedly roomy, with composed handling that makes urban driving and country roads a pleasure. For buyers who want an electric car that turns heads without shouting, the Polestar 4 is a stylish, clever choice that balances practicality with personality.

Quick data check: Polestar 4

  • moderately more power
  • a bit more efficient
  • clearly more electric range
  • only slightly lighter
  • barely cheaper
  • marginally quicker 0–100 km/h
  • very slightly more trunk space
from £45,400
7X

ZEEKR 7X

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 421 - 646 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 17.7 - 19.9 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 480 - 615 km

ZEEKR 7X as a suitable alternative to Volvo EX60

The Zeekr 7X and Volvo EX60 go head-to-head in our compact-luxury EV showdown, pitting China’s tech-forward bravado against Sweden’s calm, safety-first pedigree. We drive them back-to-back to find which delivers more range, refinement and real-world value — and which one you'll actually enjoy living with every day.

The Zeekr 7X blends sleek, coupe-like styling with a roomy, premium cabin, giving it a confident presence on the road. It pairs refined handling with advanced tech and driver aids, making it an appealing choice for buyers who want electric performance without sacrificing comfort.

Quick data check: ZEEKR 7X

  • marginally more power
  • somewhat more efficient
  • markedly more electric range
  • barely lighter
  • somewhat cheaper
  • only slightly quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally more trunk space
from £54,400
Q6 e-tron

Audi Q6 e-tron

  • Engine Type Electric
  • Transmission Automatic
  • Drive Type Rear-Wheel Drive, All-Wheel Drive
  • Power HP 252 - 490 HP
  • Consumption kWh/100km 15.4 - 18.4 kWh/100km
  • Electric Range 535 - 668 km

Audi Q6 e-tron as a suitable alternative to Volvo EX60

The Audi Q6 e‑tron and the Volvo EX60 go head‑to‑head as premium electric SUVs — one serving up sporty German precision, the other offering calm Scandinavian comfort and safety. We'll compare range, tech, driving feel and everyday usability to help you decide which one earns a spot in your garage (and which one is better at impressing the neighbors).

The Audi Q6 e-tron combines Audi's premium design and refined interior with a modern electric drivetrain that delivers effortless, quiet acceleration. It feels spacious and tech-forward, making it a comfortable and confident choice for buyers who want an upscale electric SUV for daily driving and longer trips.

Quick data check: Audi Q6 e-tron

  • very slightly cheaper
  • visibly more power
  • marginally more efficient
  • somewhat more electric range
  • a bit quicker 0–100 km/h
  • marginally lighter
  • barely more trunk space
DriveDuel uses data analysis and artificial intelligence to evaluate vehicle data and create content. Content is regularly reviewed and improved. The displayed prices are estimates based on German list prices, adjusted to the respective country’s VAT. Country-specific registration taxes are not included. This information is not legally binding.